Businesses take 20.9 hours on average to respond with mitigating actions to cyberattacks, a Deep Instinct survey found. The predictive-analytics vendor commissioned Hayhurst Consultancy to canvass 1,500 senior cybersecurity executives in 11 countries in July, finding lack of threat prevention “specific to never-before-seen malware” was a “top concern” among 44%. “Given the lag time that security teams often face when responding to an attack, survey respondents were uncertain whether it is possible to prevent the constant waves of attacks from cybercriminals,” said Deep Instinct. “Threats from within” remain a “persistent issue,” it said, finding 86% lacked confidence “that their fellow employees will not click on malicious links, easily allowing threats into an environment and initiating an attack or breach.”

The recent spate of ransomware attacks and other cyberthreats prompted Google to form a cybersecurity action team to offer customers “strategic advisory services” and threat intelligence and incident response expertise, said the company Tuesday. “Cybersecurity is at the top of every C-level and board agenda.

Intel is optimistic about the results of last week’s inaugural meeting in Pittsburgh of the EU-U.S. Trade and Technology Council (see 2110010037) because it has “significant operations on both sides of the Atlantic, including semiconductor plants and R&D centers,” blogged Chief Trade Officer Jeff Rittener Tuesday. “The conversations that took place take us one step closer to alignment on regulatory policies to help reduce trade barriers.” The TTC established a multilateral approach to export controls as a top priority for “supporting a global level-playing field,” he said. “A harmonized export control regime among like-minded transatlantic partners would ensure products are available in an increasingly digital world.” The regime has “significant potential for increased cooperation and harmonization between the U.S. and the EU, especially as narratives such as technological sovereignty and open strategic autonomy shape dialogues,” said Rittener. “Both entities should make sure that any new controls are smart controls that meet the national security objectives of the EU and U.S.”

GeoBroadcast Solutions will demonstrate its geotargeted radio tech on Roberts Radio’s WRBJ(FM) Brandon, Mississippi, in “the coming weeks,” said Roberts Radio CEO Steve Roberts in calls with FCC Media Bureau Audio Division Chief Al Shuldiner and aides to Commissioner Brendan Carr and Commissioner Geoffrey Starks, per a filing posted in docket 20-401 Monday. GBS filed a report with the FCC on a previous demo of the tech (see 2109200066), which requires a change in the booster rules to be used on a broad basis.

Companies claiming they’re protecting student safety might be surveilling them inappropriately instead, three Democratic senators wrote Monday. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey, both of Massachusetts, and Richard Blumenthal, Conn., wrote to the owners of Gaggle, Bark Technologies, GoGuardian and Securly about their use of AI "and algorithmic systems to monitor students’ online activity.” They raised concerns the companies’ monitoring practices violate federal law, compound “racial disparities in school discipline” and drain “resources from more effective student supports.” GoGuardian said in a statement it received the letter and is looking forward to responding. It said it’s a “proud signatory of the Student Privacy Pledge, certified as [Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act]-compliant by the Internet Keep Safe Coalition, and trusted by schools and districts across the U.S. to help protect their students.” Gaggle said it "takes privacy and student safety seriously; the company has a robust privacy policy that strictly limits students’ personally identifiable information (PII) to students’ names and school districts (in other words, Gaggle does not collect any data related to students’ race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation) and layers its artificial intelligence with a team of trained content reviewers to analyze context and help prevent false flags." The other companies didn’t comment.

DOJ’s Antitrust Division will bring enforcement actions when anticompetitive conduct by standard-essential patent holders or other players in the standards development process harms competition, Economics Director-Enforcement Jeffrey Wilder told a Global Competition Review summit Wednesday. But not every patent licensing dispute “invites an antitrust challenge,” said Wilder. Though antitrust claims are no “panacea for failed bilateral negotiation,” antitrust should play a role “when the standards-setting process is used to thwart competition and harm consumers,” he said. He vowed the division will promote policies “that encourage good-faith licensing negotiation” and give “clearer guidance” on how “bad-faith conduct can hinder competition.” It will support standards-development organizations adopting intellectual property rights policies “that address licensing inefficiencies and enable the dissemination of standardized products,” he said: The division will try to be “transparent” about its enforcement priorities and policy changes.

The U.S. and EU should maintain “close coordination” and an “exchange of information” on semiconductor policy and strategy to bolster resilience of the semiconductor supply chains in both regions, blogged Jennifer Meng, Semiconductor Industry Association global policy manager, and Meghan Biery, the association’s director-global technology and security policy. “While geographic specialization has served the global semiconductor industry and its consumers well,” they said Tuesday, “it has also created potential vulnerabilities in the global value chain.” Governments in both regions are trying to introduce and implement policies to encourage investment in “high-risk gaps in the supply chains and to establish a more geographically diverse supplier base,” they said. The U.S. and EU should “jointly analyze the combined strengths and weaknesses” of those policies to ensure “each region’s respective incentive programs are open to the most globally innovative companies,” they said. Promoting information sharing and transparency about each region’s incentive programs can help build supply chain resilience, they said. The inaugural meeting of the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council convened in Pittsburgh beginning Wednesday with the goal of expanding and deepening trade and transatlantic investment ties, they said. Chips should top the U.S-EU trade partnership "agenda" in Pittsburgh, blogged Al Thompson, Intel vice president-U.S. government relations, and Fernando Loureiro, Intel senior director-government director, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Expanding "advanced semiconductor capabilities" will offer Europe and the U.S. "their best chance to reduce dependency on imports from Asia and elsewhere and re-establish themselves as major producers of computer chips," they said Tuesday. The EU and the U.S. "used to be global leaders in the semiconductor industry," they said. "With political and industry forces aligning to reinstate that leadership, we look forward to seeing the progress made in Pittsburgh this week and beyond."

Rakuten Mobile Americas offers an affordable way for carriers to replace Chinese gear in their networks, General Manager Azita Arvani said in a call with FCC Wireless Bureau staff. “American wireless carriers can deploy a cloud-native network running on the Rakuten Communications Platform as part of the rip and replace program at lower cost, higher security, and more quickly than traditional wireless appliances,” said a filing posted Tuesday in docket 21-63.

U.S. District Court in Waco, Texas, rightly denied Intel and Samsung motions to transfer the patent infringement cases in which they are defendants to the Northern District of California, ruled the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit Monday. R&D company Demaray sued Intel and Samsung in Waco for infringing two patents on use of semiconductor fab reactors. In denying the transfer motions July 1, the Waco court ruled that neither company “had established that the Northern District of California was a clearly more convenient forum than the Western District of Texas, the plaintiff’s chosen forum,” said the appeals court. “Intel and Samsung have not shown a clear and indisputable right to transfer,” it said. “Mindful of the standard of review, we are not prepared to second-guess the district court’s findings.” Neither manufacturer commented now.

Imported Apple products should be subject to a withhold release order (WRO) from Customs and Border Protection and be blocked at the ports from entering the U.S. due to possible involvement of Chinese forced labor in their production, said the Campaign for Accountability (CfA) in a Monday filing. The seizure of Apple imports "credibly tied to forced labor would be consistent with" other recent CBP enforcement actions, said the nonprofit. "There is now compelling evidence that Apple iPhones, computers, and other products should be added to the list." CfA believes "there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Apple, the world’s most valuable company, is in violation of the Tariff Act," said Executive Director Michelle Kuppersmith. By issuing a WRO and preventing the importation of Apple products linked to forced labor, CBP "has the power to compel Apple into action beyond its blanket, face-saving denials,” she said. Lawmakers asked Apple in June to work closely with CBP to be sure iPhones and other products are free of forced-labor entanglements. Apple didn't comment Monday but claimed previously its supply chains are free of forced labor. "Apple’s repeated claims to have 'thoroughly investigated' the forced labor issue are suspect, given the evidence that such factory inspections appear to be challenging, if not impossible, in China," CfA said. The group made the filing through CBP's e-Allegations portal to report suspected trade law violations. Recent Department of Homeland Security records said CBP typically accepts or rejects WRO petitions within 30 days.