AT&T Michigan and Sprint filed with the Michigan Public Service Commission Tuesday a proposed agreement partially resolving their IP interconnection dispute. It still leaves in question the answer to the central argument between the companies: Sprint’s ability to get IP interconnection with AT&T. Under the agreement, all traffic Sprint exchanges with AT&T will be delivered in TDM format. The sides agreed they may, on or around July 15, amend the agreement to include IP interconnection. Spokesmen for both companies declined comment. The agreement comes after the MPSC ruled (http://bit.ly/1k7xkBc) in Sprint’s favor (CD Dec 10 p12) and ordered AT&T to reach an IP interconnection agreement with the company. The MPSC has 30 days to act on the agreement. It’s scheduled to meet again March 6. The companies faced a deadline Tuesday to submit the agreement.
The FCC should set a firm date for second-tier carriers to provide text-to-911 services, the Vermont Enhanced 911 Board told the FCC in a letter (http://bit.ly/1ewSDUz) Tuesday. Board Executive David Tucker wrote that the office has had discussions with some of those carriers, “and in at least one case, we were informed that the carrier has no plans to implement text to 911 services until it becomes a requirement set by the Commission.” Second-tier carriers are a small part of the state’s wireless market but, Tucker wrote, “we need them all to provide the service in order to reach the goal of ubiquitous Text to 911 services in Vermont."
Any attempt by the FCC to preempt state laws that make it harder for municipalities to create broadband networks (CD Feb 24 p1) “would undermine local government accountability to state governments and to taxpayers” and be illegal, said the Free State Foundation Wednesday (http://bit.ly/1dzYdG4). FSF Scholar Seth Cooper said stripping states’ control over their cities and counties would violate constitutional federalism principles. Nearly 20 states laws limit municipal-backed broadband networks, and “prevent local government conflicts of interest with the private sector marketplace competitors who invest tens of millions of dollars in localities to build out their broadband networks,” wrote Cooper. “They also protect local taxpayers from potentially devastating financial losses from poorly-run municipal broadband projects."
The FCC should ensure no barriers exist in states’ ability to acquire data to investigate rural call completion issues, and there should be no obstacles to the ability of states to coordinate investigations with other states, the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) said in a reply (http://bit.ly/MYEx8C) to a Nov. 8 FCC Further NPRM (http://bit.ly/1k7cjXc) on rural call completion. NASUCA echoed comments by NARUC (http://bit.ly/1jxcecz) that the FCC should codify prohibitions on blocking, choking or restricting traffic, even as appeals of the USF reform order are pending at the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. NASUCA also said intermediate providers should register and certify they will follow industry standards, as well as state and FCC rules, and that no additional safe harbors reducing obligations to collect and retain data should be created. NASUCA objected to Verizon’s reply (http://bit.ly/1mF9j68), which backed adjusting safe-harbor reporting requirements to exempt minimal volumes of traffic for overflow purposes, and to increase the number of intermediate carriers allowed to be used under the safe-harbor provision from one to two. “Verizon’s complaints about ’the already high burdens of complying with the Order’ overlook the tremendous burdens placed on consumers by call completion failures,” NASUCA said. “Requirements that ease consumers’ burdens by preventing call completion failures are reasonable solutions to this industry-created problem.” The FCC November order applied recording, retention, and reporting requirements to large long-distance voice providers, defined as those that make the initial long-distance call path choice for more than 100,000 domestic retail subscriber lines.
The National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) said Monday it backs Senate efforts to pass legislation aimed at curbing abusive patent litigation, but told the leaders of the Senate Commerce and Judiciary committees that it has some concerns with language in the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act (S-1720). In the letter, co-signed by 42 state and territorial attorneys general, NAAG urged the Senate to pass patent legislation that confirms the authority of state attorneys general to bring enforcement actions concurrently with the Federal Trade Commission on “bad-faith” demand letters. The group also urged the Senate to clarify state courts’ jurisdiction over demand letters and asked the Senate to require patent ownership disclosures when an entity sends a demand letter, rather than only when an entity files a lawsuit (http://bit.ly/1fnIwYe). Senate consideration of patent legislation follows the House’s passage of the Innovation Act (HR-3309).
Residential white page listings provided by AT&T will be removed from future YP Real Yellow Pages and YP Real White Pages in select communities in California, Texas, South Carolina and Louisiana. YP, AT&T’s official white pages publisher, said in news releases Monday that a number of free options exist for accessing free YP Real White Pages. They include using RealPagesLive.com, ordering a free version of the YP Real White Pages directory on CD-ROM, or accessing and searching residential listings on YP.com. The free directories can be obtained by calling 866-329-7118 or going to MyDirectories.YP.com. In California (http://bit.ly/MoNqaA), the listings will be removed in communities including Bakersfield, Butte, Culver City, Los Angeles, Sacramento and Stockton. In Texas (http://bit.ly/1hq2n6g), affected communities include Amarillo, Rio Grande Valley and Temple. South Carolina (http://bit.ly/1c1F1pY) markets include Anderson. In Louisiana (http://bit.ly/1cIcMuo), the impacted communities include Lake Charles, St. Tammany and Tangipahoa Parish. YP said that in all states, the decision reflects recent usage feedback and research from consumers.
It would be helpful to eligible telecom carriers to be able to retain proof of eligibility documents ETCs collect when signing up Lifeline subscribers, Oklahoma Corporation Commission officials told the FCC. The FCC doesn’t now let ETCs retain the records, but carriers want to keep them in case issues arise. An ex parte notice (http://bit.ly/1fnixyA) filed Thursday said OCC Telcom Policy Director Maribeth Snapp and Regulatory Manager Jim Jones met with Wireline Bureau staff Feb. 7. The OCC officials explained the steps being taken to ensure that ETCs providing Lifeline service are complying with federal and state rules. OCC staff also suggested that enhanced Lifeline support on tribal lands be limited to those carriers that are building out infrastructure on such lands.
Consumer advocacy groups praised Google for saying Wednesday it’s considering installing Google Fiber in as many as 34 more cities (CD Feb 20 p14). It will mean “more communities across the country may soon have increased options for home fiber Internet access,” said Sarah Morris, senior policy counsel at New America’s Open Technology Institute, in a statement Wednesday (http://bit.ly/1fCqQD2). “While no single series of deployments can solve the major broadband competition problem that we face in the U.S. -- particularly in light of the announced intended consolidation of the two largest cable broadband providers -- this is a positive step for a handful of communities across the country.” Comcast agreed last week to buy Time Warner Cable for about $45 billion. “There’s still much work to be done in fixing the digital divide that continues to thwart ubiquitous communications access in low-income and rural communities,” said Morris. “Any time there’s a prospect that Internet users anywhere might have better service, it’s good news,” said Public Knowledge senior staff attorney John Bergmayer http://bit.ly/OeFCdo). “Google’s announcement puts lie to the often-repeated claim that Americans somehow simply don’t want or don’t need better broadband service. ... When incumbents fail to invest in their networks and opt instead for a strategy of ‘harvesting’ their existing networks and collecting high bills for bad service, new entrants like Google have a chance to come in and replace them. This is especially true as newer network technologies, like fiber to the home, mature and show they are able to provide better service than copper-based service.” Bergmayer said Google should be pushed to provide service to low-income communities.
AT&T and Sprint got an extension to Tuesday to come up with an interconnection agreement, said the Michigan Public Service Commission (http://bit.ly/1h1Ss81) Thursday. The PSC had given the companies til Jan. 21 to come up with the agreement, after ordering AT&T Dec. 6 to provide Sprint IP interconnection. The companies have since twice requested and got extensions. The PSC said no more extensions will be given after Tuesday’s deadline.
The local number portability administration selection process “could cause substantial damage to the industry and consumers,” Michigan Internet & Telecommunications Alliance Executive Director John Liskey wrote the FCC Monday (http://bit.ly/NbQdoa). Citing a recent Standish Group report, Liskey said switching number portability vendors would cost the industry between $300 million and $600 million. “The report suggests the industry will not be able to recoup the costs within the five-year contract period, and the switch will increase costs and stifle innovation,” wrote Liskey. The selection process has not adequately considered the impact switching number portability vendors would have on small- and medium-sized vendors, he wrote. He worried the portability process has been a “closed one involving only a handful of carriers.” Other CLECs have expressed concern about the process. Comptel, Cbeyond, HyperCube and TDS Metrocom forwarded a letter to the FCC (http://bit.ly/1fPTdkN) that they had sent to North American Portability Management in November (CD Feb 10 p13).