Rob Strayer started work earlier this week as deputy assistant secretary of state-cybersecurity and international communications and information policy, and U.S. coordinator for international communications (CIC) and information policy, as expected (see 1708220059), the Computer & Communications Industry Association and two communications sector lobbyists separately confirmed. Strayer entered the role with foreign policy experience via his previous role as legislative director and general counsel to Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and cyber policy experience in a past role as director of the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Homeland Security Project. Strayer's appointment to an expanded DAS role appears to confirm earlier concerns that State's Office of Coordinator for Cyber Issues could be absorbed into another departmental office (see 1708030009), one industry lobbyist said. Strayer's expanded role gives him authority over cyber and international telecom policy issues, but it's unclear whether the cyber issues office was absorbed into the CIC office, a lobbyist said. The White House, State and Corker's office didn't comment. Strayer acknowledged his move to State in a Monday tweet, but didn't disclose his role. Strayer moved to State without any formal White House announcement because President Donald Trump's administration is “still working through” whether to also nominate him at the level of an ambassador, as other presidents have done in naming past CICs, a telecom lobbyist said. The CIC role doesn't require Senate approval but all ambassadors go through the nominations process via Senate Foreign Relations. Nomination of the CIC as a U.S. ambassador can be important since the person in that role often has led the U.S. delegation to ITU conferences, the telecom lobbyist said. Strayer's appointment “is strategically important to ensure the U.S. has a strong voice at the table as key negotiations take place on issues from trade to tech policy, which impact the growth of the fastest growing sector of the U.S. economy at home and abroad,” said CCIA President Ed Black. “Given the importance of his portfolio, we hope that the Deputy Assistant Secretary receives an Ambassadorship to aid him in advocating.”

European Justice Commissioner Vera Jourová "stressed the importance of a robust and trustworthy annual review [of the Privacy Shield], given the concerns of European stakeholders" to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, said a European Commission spokesman in a statement Monday. Acting FTC Chairman Maureen Ohlhausen and representatives of European data protection in Washington also attended the launch of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield review was also attended. The EC spokesman said Jourová emphasized the review should show how U.S. commitments are being met, that the underlying U.S. legal framework remains in place and oversight mechanisms, namely the State Department ombudsperson, are functional. Experts said the review may find faults within the framework, but expect the agreement to be maintained (see 1708210043). Jourová and Ross plan to meet Wednesday to discuss how the review went and areas to address or if more information is needed to complete it, the EC spokesman said. Jourová, he said, plans to issue a report in the second half of October. In a statement, Jourová said the meeting with Ross was "good and honest ... I am glad to be reassured that America First doesn't mean America only." Commerce didn't comment and the White House said last week the U.S.'s commitment "cannot be stronger." The Computer & Communications Industry Association and U.S. Council for International Business joined others (see 1709150024) supporting the agreement and review. USCIB said the framework is promoting stronger protections of people's personal data and is an effective mechanism for certification by small- and medium-sized businesses. It said longevity of the agreement is important. Nearly 2,500 businesses are certified under the agreement, according to the Privacy Shield website.

Tech groups are watching the first review of the Privacy Shield U.S.-EU trans-Atlantic data sharing pact, hoping for the agreement to continue, as others expect will occur (see 1708210043). A positive joint review would "strengthen trust among all industry sectors and citizens on both sides of the Atlantic," BSA|The Software Alliance said Thursday. "It will provide businesses with the legal certainty they need ... and will help further increase the number of Privacy Shield-certified companies." Software & Information Industry Association Vice President-Public Policy Mark MacCarthy said SIIA will "continue to help the U.S. and EU delegations in any way possible to make the review a success.” The review is Monday and Tuesday.

U.K. Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Karen Bradley is referring Fox's planned buy of Sky to the Competition and Markets Authority for a full, six-month investigation, she said in a statement Thursday to Parliament. The CMA investigation is to be on media plurality and genuine commitment to broadcasting standards grounds, she said. She said she received letters from Sky and Fox confirming they disagreed with her announcement Tuesday that she likely would refer the deal (see 1709120010) and that CMA will provide a recommendation on whether to allow the transaction, including possible conditions. Fox in a statement said it "look[s] forward to engaging constructively with the CMA, as independent authority, and hope that the findings of this process will be respected by the Secretary of State." It still hopes to close on Sky by the end of June.

​President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday blocking Canyon Bridge Fund’s $1.3 billion acquisition of Lattice Semiconductor, supplier of smart connectivity products for Ultra HD and other applications, on national security grounds, said the White House. Canyon Bridge is a private equity fund with investors that include China Venture Capital Fund Corp., which is “owned by Chinese state-owned entities that manages industrial investments and venture capital,” said a White House statement. Trump blocked the sale under 1950's Defense Production Act, which authorizes the president to “suspend or prohibit certain acquisitions that result in foreign control of a United States business if he concludes, among other things, that there is credible evidence that the foreign interest exercising control might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,” said the White House. Cited national security risks include “the potential transfer of intellectual property to the foreign acquirer,” the importance of semiconductor “supply chain integrity” to the U.S. government and the fact that the U.S. government buys Lattice products. Lattice representatives didn’t comment. The company's 8-K filing Sept. 1 at the SEC said the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States would recommend to Trump that he should block the deal. “Lattice remains of the view that the proposed transaction does not raise any national security concerns that cannot be addressed by the comprehensive mitigation measures that Lattice and Canyon Bridge have proposed to implement,” the company said then.

Commercial passenger air travel is booming in Asia, and air carriers -- trying to entice customers to pay for in-flight connectivity -- could see some success by first providing such service for free, Northern Sky Research analyst Claude Rousseau blogged Tuesday. NSR said Asia will dominate in-flight connectivity demand growth over the next decade, with 20-plus airlines having installed the satellite-based systems. NSR said more than 1,000 in-service passenger jets likely will be offering such connectivity by year-end, reaching 5,400 over the next 10 years.

Personal safety and emergency notifications are the most desired smart home features among European broadband households with at least one smartphone, said a Tuesday Strategy Analytics report. Alerts to fire and other emergencies were five times more desired than the ability to schedule or adjust window coverings remotely, said the survey of 6,000 broadband households. The least desired functions were ability to program lights, cover windows and control a gate.

Representatives from the National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America are scheduled to meet with the FCC this week about their concerns about the agency's elimination of Form 740 filing requirements for imported RF devices (see 1707130032). NCBFAA is pleased the requirements went away, but worries about what's seen as new liabilities for customs brokers included in the order, said Alan Klestadt, a lawyer with Grunfeld Desiderio, who represents the NCBFAA. “The new regulations talk about customs brokers being responsible to validate FCC compliance,” Klestadt said during an NCBFAA conference Monday. “There isn't a person in this room who's qualified to do that, and I say that without any disrespect. There's just no way.” Naming customs brokers as “one of the parties with responsibility to validate” is a “huge additional burden,” he said.

Decusoft, Md7 and Tru Communication, doing business as TCPrinting.net, separately settled FTC allegations they misled consumers about participation in the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield agreement and failed to complete the certification process, said the agency in a Friday news release. Commissioners voted 2-0 to issue the administrative complaints and accept the consent agreements, which will be published in the Federal Register and available for comment through Oct. 10. The complaints are the first enforcement cases since the trans-Atlantic data protection and sharing arrangement was established in early 2016 (see 1602020040 and 1602040018). The companies are barred from misrepresenting their participation in privacy or data security programs sponsored by governments, self-regulatory regimes or standard-setting organizations and must comply with FTC reporting requirements, the release said. Tru Communication owner Jon Harris told us he used a third party to get self-certified with Privacy Shield and received a letter from the organization saying his small business was certified. But he said the letter may have meant he was certified with the third party, not Privacy Shield. "We got confused," he said. Harris said the website statement his company is Privacy Shield-compliant was removed. He said he isn't pursuing Privacy Shield certification because it's long and complicated and it was at the behest of one of his foreign customers. The other companies didn't comment. The agency said it also filed a complaint against Decusoft for falsely claiming participation in the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield framework. Almost 2,500 companies participate in the EU-US framework.

Intel won a reprieve from the European Court of Justice, which sided with the company's appeal against a lower court ruling that upheld a 1.06 billion euro ($1.26 billion) European Commission fine (see 0912170127). The ECJ said in a Wednesday news release it's sending the case back to the General Court to re-examine Intel's arguments whether its rebates to computer makers and a retailer restricted competition. "While this case concerns events that happened more than a decade ago, we have always believed that our actions were lawful and did not harm competition," said Intel General Counsel Steven Rodgers in a statement. In 2009, the EC alleged Intel "abused" its market dominance for x86 CPUs from 2002 to 2007, with a 70 percent market share that made it difficult for competitors like Advanced Micro Devices to enter, said the release. Regulators alleged that Intel gave rebates to Dell, Lenovo, HP and NEC as long as they bought from the chipmaker "all, or almost all, of their x86 CPUs," and also made payments to Germany-based microelectronics retailer Media-Saturn-Holding to exclusively sell computers with the x86 CPUs. The EC said Intel's strategy "induced the loyalty" of those companies, significantly reducing competition and consumer choice, and imposed the penalty, noted the ECJ. Intel appealed the EC decision but the General Court dismissed that action in 2014. Intel appealed to ECJ. The court said the lower court failed to examine "errors allegedly committed" by regulators on an "as efficient competitor" test, which Intel raised. ECJ said the lower court failed to analyze "whether the rebates at issue were capable of restricting competition." The high court rejected Intel's argument that the EC lacked territorial jurisdiction.